A funding-fit memo · BC non-profit housing

Is it allowed?
Does it fit the funders?
What is still unsure?

First Read answers all three for one site and one building option, in hours, with the clause and the date behind every answer. Before the first drawing.

Run the real case See how it works

Runs in your browser. Nothing is uploaded; nothing is guessed.

Massing of 998 E 19th AveThe proposed six-storey mass in blue over the outright three-storey envelope, dashed, on the lot, drawn in metres from the memo's own numbers. Proposed6 storeys · 22.3 m · FSR 2.95 Outright3 storeys · 9.9 m · FSR 1.2 E 19th Avenue lot 75.6 × 37.2 m · 2,811 m²
Scroll · the case is 998 E 19th Ave, Vancouver, as approved by Council 01 / 05

01The gate

The first reliable answer moves from after six figures to after a few hours.

A board votes $200,000 to $500,000 of pre-development money on a feasibility read that cites nothing and carries no date. The memo gives that gate a dated, cited answer first.

02What it found

Three answers, on one sheet.

998 E 19th Ave: six storeys of social housing on church land, approved by Council in July 2024. The inputs come from the City's public report.

Site998 E 19th Ave, Vancouver · RM-1
OptionAs approved · 6 storeys · 105 units
RevisionR1 · rules as of 23 Oct 2026
Rezoning pathCD-1 under the Interim Rezoning Policy

1 · Is it allowed?

Not outright. By rezoning: yes, with conditions.

FSR 2.95 over the outright 1.20; height 22.3 m over the 10.7 m outright and above the staff benchmark of 19.9 to 21.3 m.

2 · Does it fit the funders?

Not yet confirmed.

BC Builds and the Community Housing Fund both wait on figures the option leaves blank: the below-market share, the rent tiers, accessible units, land tenure.

3 · What is still unsure?

Four open items, each with a named person.

Trees: 20 required on 2,811 m², 17 after; plant 3 more or $3,000 cash in lieu. The architect finds the room; the manager supplies the funders' figures.

03How it works

Address and option in. Cited rules, a massing and a dated memo out.

A rule stack in six layers, held as data with a source and a date on every line. A deterministic engine reads it. A model may propose a rule or a site fact; a person confirms it; the engine decides.

  1. 01Site and option

    Give it a site and an option.

    Address, district, lot, trees, owner. Storeys, floor area, units, rents, funders. "Not sure" is an honest answer and never becomes a guess.

  2. 02Rules

    Run the rules.

    24 dated, cited rules and assumptions from 25 public sources, in six layers. Same inputs under the same rules give the same memo, every time, in under a second.

  3. 03Memo

    Read the memo.

    Three answers, every open item with a named person, a feasibility-grade pro-forma with every line cited, the massing the rules allow in plan, section and 3D, and a Revit sheet built from the same numbers.

04Who it's for

Three readers. One memo.

The rules a site must satisfy are read today by different people, at different stages, from different documents. The memo reads all of them on day one, for everyone.

  1. 01Development manager

    Decides what to take to the board.

    Runs a site before any money goes to design, acts on the open items, carries the PDF into the room.

  2. 02Architect

    Tests options, compares, draws.

    Changes a number, runs again, reads the two memos side by side, and takes the massing into Revit.

  3. 03Board, planner, funder

    Reads two pages, cold.

    Trusts what looks like a careful memo: dated, cited, every finding with its arithmetic and its person.

05By the numbers

Small, local, and honest about what it does not know.

  • 5

    layers of rules: district, Province, City policy, design standards, funders

  • 17from 13 sources

    dated, cited rules, each with its clause and the date it took effect

  • 0

    language models in the loop; the engine is plain Python and the memo is a record

  • R1 R2 R3

    every memo on a site is a numbered revision, so a rule change shows as a change

Try it on a real case.

The walkthrough takes two minutes and runs the rules for you. Or compare the approved option with a what-if that answers every funder's question.

Run the real case with a walkthrough See two options compared